Should media be liable for publishing accurate but non-consensual sex tapes?

NameShould media be liable for publishing accurate but non-consensual sex tapes?
DescriptionAccording to reports, Gawker was held liable in the Hulk Hogan lawsuit for invasion of privacy after publishing a sex tape, despite its accuracy; the case was partly funded by Peter Thiel. Some argue privacy protections prevent personal exploitation and harm, while others contend press freedom demands publishing truthful content in the public interest. Recent discussions have revived this debate on balancing individual rights and journalistic standards.
CircuitaMACI-1p1v
Voting system

Anonymous anti-collusion voting system, in which one voice credit equals one vote.

Proof systemGroth16
Zkey
Status
Round start

Round end

Operator
pubkey
x11043362857411207101295473092701542792077153813505230615881421921648274746246
y3431336307758495332528815819065155244352578928861293932308944643929528727389
Creator
Contract addressdora1rwrm90zz59u89jpm628te3e2amqaqh5g9uf7ajdv9l9qm9wwjygs3qmtp8
Block height

14,962,692 (at contract creation)

Voting options
  • Option 1

    Yes

  • Option 2

    No

Transactions in the round

Timestamp (UTC)StatusTypeRoundCircuitSenderTxn hashLink

Successop:deploydora1rwr…mtp8aMACI-1p1v968CA6…1F7C37

All transactions loaded.